MRI-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (CROSSFIRE): a single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. Stage III locally advanced pancreatic cancer is considered unresectable and current palliative chemotherapy regimens only modestly improve survival. Guidelines suggest chemoradiation or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) could be beneficial in certain circumstances. Other local treatments such as irreversible electroporation could enhance patient outcomes by extending survival while preserving quality of life. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MRI-guided SABR versus CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation following standard FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. METHODS: CROSSFIRE was an open-label, randomised phase 2 superiority trial conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with confirmed histological and radiological stage III locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The maximum tumour diameter was 5 cm and patients had to be pretreated with three to eight cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to MRI-guided SABR (five fractions of 8 Gy delivered on non-consecutive days) or CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation using a computer-generated variable block randomisation model. The primary endpoint was overall survival from randomisation, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the per-protocol population. A prespecified interim futility analysis was done after inclusion of half the original sample size, with a conditional probability of less than 0·2 resulting in halting of the study. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02791503. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2016, and March 31, 2022, 68 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SABR (n=34) or irreversible electroporation (n=34), of whom 64 were treated according to protocol. Of the 68 participants, 36 (53%) were male and 32 (47%) were female, with a median age of 65 years (IQR 57-70). Median overall survival from randomisation was 16·1 months (95% CI 12·1-19·4) in the SABR group versus 12·5 months (10·9-17·0) in the irreversible electroporation group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·39 [95% CI 0·84-2·30]; p=0·21). The conditional probability to demonstrate superiority of either technique was 0·13; patient accrual was therefore stopped early for futility. 20 (63%) of 32 patients in the SABR group versus 19 (59%) of 32 patients in the irreversible electroporation group had adverse events (p=0·8) and five (16%) patients in the SABR group versus eight (25%) in the irreversible electroporation group had grade 3-5 adverse events (p=0·35). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were cholangitis (two [6%] in the SABR group vs one [3%] in the irreversible electroporation group), abdominal pain (one [3%] vs two [6%]), and pancreatitis (none vs two [6%]). One (3%) patient in the SABR group and one (3%) in the irreversible electroporation group died from a treatment-related adverse event. INTERPRETATION: CROSSFIRE did not identify a difference in overall survival or incidence of adverse events between MRI-guided SABR and CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation after FOLFIRINOX. Future studies should further assess the added value of local ablative treatment over chemotherapy alone. FUNDING: Adessium Foundation, AngioDynamics.

Impact of Short-Course Palliative Radiation Therapy on Pancreatic Cancer-Related Pain: Prospective Phase 2 Nonrandomized PAINPANC Trial.

PURPOSE: Clinical evidence is limited regarding palliative radiation therapy for relieving pancreatic cancer-related pain. We prospectively investigated pain response after short-course palliative radiation therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe pancreatic cancer-related pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this prospective phase 2 single center nonrandomized trial, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (5-10, on a 0-10 scale) of pancreatic cancer refractory to pain medication, were treated with a short-course palliative radiation therapy; 24 Gy in 3 weekly fractions (2015-2018). Primary endpoint was defined as a clinically relevant average decrease of ≥2 points in pain severity, compared with baseline, within 7 weeks after the start of treatment. Secondary endpoint was global quality of life (QoL), with a clinically relevant increase of 5 to 10 points (0-100 scale). Pain severity reduction and QoL were assessed 9 times using the Brief Pain Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-PAL, respectively. Both outcomes were analyzed using joint modeling. In addition, acute toxicity based on clinician reporting and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) received palliative radiation therapy. At baseline, the median oral morphine equivalent daily dose was 129.5 mg (range, 20.0-540.0 mg), which decreased to 75.0 mg (range, 15.0-360.0 mg) after radiation (P = .021). Pain decreased on average 3.15 points from baseline to 7 weeks (one-sided P = .045). Patients reported a clinically relevant mean pain severity reduction from 5.9 to 3.8 points (P = .011) during the first 3 weeks, which further decreased to 3.2 until week 11, ending at 3.4 (P = .006) in week 21 after the first radiation therapy fraction. Global QoL significantly improved from 50.5 to 60.8 during the follow-up period (P = .001). Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 3 patients and no grade 4 to 5 toxicity was observed. Median OS was 11.8 weeks, with a 13.3% 1-year actuarial OS rate. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course palliative radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer-related pain was associated with rapid, clinically relevant reduction in pain severity, and clinically relevant improvement in global QoL, with mostly mild toxicity.

Urethra-Sparing Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Sexual Function and Radiation Dose to the Penile Bulb, the Crura, and the Internal Pudendal Arteries From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common side effect after prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We aimed to assess the correlation between the dose to the penile bulb (PB), internal pudendal arteries (IPA), and crura with the development of ED after ultrahypofractionation as part of a phase 2 clinical trial of urethra-sparing prostate SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among the 170 patients with localized prostate cancer from 9 centers included in the trial, 90 men with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade 0 to 1 ED (ED-) at baseline treated with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were selected for the present analysis. Doses delivered to the PB, crura, and IPA were analyzed and correlated with grade 2 to 3 ED (ED+) development. The effect on quality of life, assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-PR25) questionnaire, was reported. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 43% (n = 39) of the patients developed ED+, and 57% (n = 51) remained ED-. The dose delivered to the crura was significantly higher in ED+ patients than in ED- patients (7.7 vs 3.6 Gy [P = .014] for the Dmean and 18.5 vs 7.2 Gy [P = .015] for the D2%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between ED+ and ED- patients was observed for the dose delivered to the PB and IPA. The median ED+-free survival was worse in patients receiving a crura Dmean ≥ 4.7 versus < 4.7 Gy (51.5% vs 71.7%, P = .005) and a crura D2% > 12 versus ≤ 12 Gy (54.9% vs 68.9%, P = .015). No ED+-free survival differences were observed for doses delivered to the PB and IPA. Decline in EORTC QLQ-PR25 sexual functioning was significantly more pronounced in patients with higher doses to the crura. CONCLUSIONS: By keeping a Dmean and D2% to crura below 4.7 and 12 Gy, respectively, the risk of developing ED+ after prostate SBRT may be significantly reduced.

Clinical outcomes of MR-guided adrenal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with preferential sparing of organs at risk.

Background and purpose: The optimal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) doses for adrenal tumors are unknown. Some trials have specified that organ at risk (OAR) dose constraints should take priority over target coverage. We performed a retrospective review of the outcomes of MR-guided adrenal SABR (MRgRT) delivered with OAR sparing. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent adrenal MRgRT between 2016 and 2023 were identified from our Ethics-approved institutional database. Dose ranged between 8 and 24 Gy per fraction, delivered in 1-5 fractions. A 3 mm margin was added to the breath-hold gross tumor volume (GTV) to derive a PTV. Plan were delivered to an 'optimized' PTV that was generated by excluding any overlap with OARs. Results: Adrenal SABR was performed in 107 patients (114 metastases). The commonest scheme used 5 fractions of 10 Gy (53.5 %); 82 % of plans delivered a BED10 ≧ 80 Gy. Systemic therapy was administered within 3 months preceding or following SABR in 53.5 % of patients. Grade 3 acute toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) occurred in 0.9 % of patients, and 4.4 % reported late toxicity, consisting of adrenal insufficiency and a vertebral collapse. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range, 0.0-73.4 months). Local progression occurred in 7.4 % of evaluable patients. PTV underdosage was frequent, with a coverage compromise index (D99/prescription dose) of < 0.90 in 52 % of all plans. Recurrences were independent of the prescription doses. Conclusion: MRgRT for adrenal metastases is well tolerated with high local control rates despite prioritizing OAR sparing over PTV coverage. Studies using deformable dose accumulation may lead to a better understanding of dose-response relationship with adaptive SABR.

Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM. METHODS: In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.

Every-Other-Day Versus Once-a-Week Urethra-Sparing Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to present the 5-year results from a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 randomized trial of every-other-day (EOD) versus once-a-week (QW) urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2012 and 2015, 170 patients with cT1c-3aN0M0 prostate cancer from 9 European institutions were randomized to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy/fraction to the urethra) delivered either EOD (arm A, n = 84) or QW (arm B, n = 86). The median follow-up was 78 months (interquartile range, 66-89 months) and 77 months (interquartile range, 66-82 months) for arms A and B, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 165 patients treated and retained for the final analysis (arm A, n = 82; arm B, n = 83), acute toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 scale) was mild or absent, with no differences between arms. The 5-year grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxicity-free survival was 75.9% and 76.1% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .945), whereas the 5-year grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival was 89% and 92% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .596). No changes in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PR25 scores were observed in both arms for genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual domains at 5-year follow-up compared with baseline. At the last follow-up, biochemical failure was observed in 14 patients in the EOD arm and in 7 patients in the QW arm, with a 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate of 92.2% and 93% for arms A and B, respectively (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a 10% dose reduction to urethra was associated with a minimal effect on urinary function and quality of life regardless of an EOD or QW fractionation schedule. Biochemical control so far has been encouraging and much alike in both study arms, although longer follow-up is probably needed to assess the true value of overall treatment time on disease outcome.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Trade-off between planning target volume margin and online plan adaption.

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy with daily plan adaptation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer is time and labor intensive. Fifty adapted plans with 3 mm planning target volume (PTV)-margin were compared with non-adapted plans using 3 or 5 mm margins. Adequate (V95% ≥ 95%) prostate coverage was achieved in 49 fractions with 5 mm PTV without plan adaptation, however, coverage of the seminal vesicles (SV) was insufficient in 15 of 50 fractions. There was no insufficient coverage for prostate and SV using plan adaptation with 3 mm. Hence, daily adaptation is recommended to obtain adequate SV-coverage when using 3 mm PTV.

Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3-5 cm). RECENT FINDINGS: We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22-90% for all techniques; 22-89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67-90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose. Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

Treatment patterns for adrenal metastases using surgery and SABR during a 10-year period.

We studied treatment patterns for adrenal metastases using surgery or SABR at a single institution during a 10-year period. The number of patients undergoing SABR doubled since 2016, without a change in numbers undergoing surgery. Both treatments resulted in low rates of acute toxicity and similar survivals.

Renal atrophy following gated delivery of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to adrenal metastases.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) planning for adrenal metastases aims to minimize doses to the adjacent kidney. Renal dose constraints for SABR delivery are not well defined. In 20 patients who underwent MR-guided breath-hold SABR in five daily fractions of 8-10 Gy, ipsilateral renal volumes receiving ≥20 Gy best correlated with loss of renal volumes, with median renal volume reduction being 6% (range: 3%-11%, 10th-90th percentiles). Organ function did not deteriorate in 18 patients, who had post treatment renal function tests available. This suggests that the ipsilateral renal volume receiving 20 Gy can be used as partial organ dose constraint for SABR to targets in the upper abdomen.

Pancreatic Cancer and Immunotherapy: A Clinical Overview.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with high mortality. The vast majority of patients present with unresectable, advanced stage disease, for whom standard of care chemo(radio)therapy may improve survival by several months. Immunotherapy has led to a fundamental shift in the treatment of several advanced cancers. However, its efficacy in PDAC in terms of clinical benefit is limited, possibly owing to the immunosuppressive, inaccessible tumor microenvironment. Still, various immunotherapies have demonstrated the capacity to initiate local and systemic immune responses, suggesting an immune potentiating effect. In this review, we address PDAC's immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and immune evasion methods and discuss a wide range of immunotherapies, including immunomodulators (i.e., immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune stimulatory agonists, cytokines and adjuvants), oncolytic viruses, adoptive cell therapies (i.e., T cells and natural killer cells) and cancer vaccines. We provide a general introduction to their working mechanism as well as evidence of their clinical efficacy and immune potentiating abilities in PDAC. The key to successful implementation of immunotherapy in this disease may rely on exploitation of synergistic effects between treatment combinations. Accordingly, future treatment approaches should aim to incorporate diverse and novel immunotherapeutic strategies coupled with cytotoxic drugs and/or local ablative treatment, targeting a wide array of tumor-induced immune escape mechanisms.

Impact of daily plan adaptation on organ-at-risk normal tissue complication probability for adrenal lesions undergoing stereotactic ablative radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can achieve good local control for metastatic adrenal lesions. Magnetic resonance (MR)-guidance with daily on-table plan adaptation can augment the delivery of SABR with greater dose certainty. The goal of this study was to quantify the potential clinical benefit MR-guided daily-adaptive adrenal SABR using the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) framework. METHODS: Patients treated with adrenal MR-guided SABR at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP models were used to calculate the NTCP of upper abdominal organs-at-risk (OARs) at simulation and both before and after daily on-table plan adaptation. Differences in OAR NTCPs were assessed using signed-rank tests. Potential predictors of the benefits of adaptation were assessed by linear regression. RESULTS: Fifty-two adrenal MR-guided SABR courses were analyzed. The baseline simulation plan underestimated the absolute stomach NTCP by 10.0% on average (95% confidence interval: 4.7-15.2%, p < 0.001). Daily on-table adaptation lowered absolute NTCP by 8.7% (4.2-13.2%, p < 0.001). The most significant predictor of the benefits of adaptation was lesion laterality (p = 0.018), with left-sided lesions benefitting more (13.3% [6.3-20.4%], p < 0.001) than right-sided lesions (2.1% [-1.6-5.7%], p = 0.25). Sensitivity analyses did not change the statistical significance of the findings. CONCLUSION: NTCP analysis revealed that patients with left adrenal tumors were more likely to benefit from MR-guided daily on-table adaptive SABR using current dose/fractionation regimens due to reductions in predicted gastric toxicity. Right-sided adrenal lesions may be considered for dose escalation due to low predicted NTCP.

Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: The Next Step in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a new treatment paradigm and its role as a non-invasive treatment option for renal cell carcinoma is evolving. The early clinical experience to date shows that real-time plan adaptation based on the daily MRI anatomy can lead to improved target coverage and normal tissue sparing. Continued technological innovations will further mitigate the challenges of organ motion and enable more advanced treatment adaptation, and potentially lead to enhanced oncologic outcomes and preservation of renal function. Future applications look promising to make a positive clinical impact and further the personalization of radiotherapy in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Dose accumulation for personalized stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an innovative approach for delivering stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in prostate cancer (PC). Despite the increased clinical use of SBRT for PC, there is limited data on the relation between the actual delivered dose and toxicity. We aimed to identify dose parameters based on the total accumulated delivered bladder dose (DOSEACCTX). Furthermore, for future personalization, we studied whether prospective accumulation of the first 3 of 5 fractions (DOSEACC3FR) could be used as a representative of DOSEACCTX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We deployed a recently validated deformable image registration-based dose accumulation strategy to reconstruct DOSEACCTX and DOSEACC3FR in 101 PC patients treated with stereotactic MRgRT. IPSS scores at baseline, end of MRgRT, at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment were analyzed to identify a clinically relevant increase of acute urinary symptoms. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the correlation of an increase in IPSS and bladder DOSEACCTX (range V5-V36.25 Gy, D1cc, D5cc) and DOSEACC3FR (range V6-V21.8 Gy, D1cc, D5cc) parameters. RESULTS: A clinically relevant increase in IPSS in the three months following MRgRT was observed in 25 patients. The V20Gy-32Gy from DOSEACCTX and V15Gy-18Gy from DOSEACC3FR showed good correlation with IPSS increase with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.71 to 0.75. In contrast, baseline dosimetry showed a poor correlation with AUC values between 0.53 and 0.62. CONCLUSION: DOSEACCTX was superior to baseline dosimetry in predicting acute urinary symptoms. Because DOSEACC3FR also showed good correlation, this can potentially be used to optimize MRgRT for the remaining fractions.

A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of life review therapy targeting incurably ill cancer patients: do their informal caregivers benefit?

PURPOSE: Investigate whether Life Review Therapy and Memory Specificity Training (LRT-MST) targeting incurably ill cancer patients may also have a beneficial effect on caregiving burden, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and posttraumatic growth of the informal caregivers. METHODS: Data was collected in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (secondary analyses) on the effect of LRT-MST among incurably cancer patients. Informal caregivers of participating patients were asked to complete outcome measures at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2): caregiver burden (caregivers reaction assessment scale (CRA)), symptoms of anxiety and depression (hospital anxiety and depression scale), and posttraumatic growth (posttraumatic growth inventory). Linear mixed models (intention to treat) were used to assess group differences in changes over time. Effect size and independent samples t tests were used to assess group differences at T1 and T2. RESULTS: In total, 64 caregivers participated. At baseline, 56% of the caregivers experienced anxiety and 30% depression. No significant effect was found on these symptoms nor on posttraumatic growth or most aspects of caregiver burden. There was a significant effect of LRT-MST on the course of self-esteem (subscale CRA) (p = 0.013). Effect size was moderate post-intervention (ES = - 0.38, p = 0.23) and at 3-month follow-up (ES = 0.53, p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers of incurably ill cancer patients experience symptoms of anxiety and depression. LRT-MST does not improve symptoms of depression and anxiety, negative aspects of caregiver burden, or posttraumatic growth. LRT-MST may have a protective effect on self-esteem of informal caregivers (positive aspect of caregiver burden). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR 2256), registered on 23-3-2010.

Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) has allowed improved treatment planning and delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in prostate cancer (PC). The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes using this novel approach are important in shared decision making for patients. OBJECTIVE: To report HRQoL using both patient- and clinician-reported outcomes at 1 yr following stereotactic MRgRT for patients with localized PC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective phase 2 trial included 101 patients with localized PC. INTERVENTION: All patients received 36.25Gy in five fractions of MRgRT delivered within 2 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: HRQoL was prospectively assessed at baseline, at the last fraction, at 6 wk, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after treatment, by patient-reported outcome measures using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires, and International Prostate Symptom Score. At the same time points, clinicians reported on symptomatic adverse events (AEs). Effect sizes for changes in HRQoL were calculated with repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Availability of HRQoL data exceeded 95% at all study time points. From both questionnaires and the recorded AEs, the largest treatment effects on urinary and bowel symptoms were recorded in the first 6 wk of follow-up. Thereafter, all symptoms decreased and returned to baseline values at 12 mo. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. No patient reported any relevant limitation due to urinary symptoms, and only 2.2% of patients reported a relevant impact on daily activities due to bowel problems at 1 yr. The majority of patients had intermediate- or high-risk PC for which androgen deprivation therapy (83.2%) was prescribed, thereby precluding study of MRgRT on sexual function. Longer follow-up is awaited in order to evaluate the oncological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of MRgRT for SBRT resulted in low toxicity at 1 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: All patients completed magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, which was well tolerated with only transient early urinary and bowel symptoms, which resolved 1 yr after treatment, as confirmed by patient-reported outcome measures.

The Role of Daily Adaptive Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer.

Novel magnetic-resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) permits real-time soft-tissue visualization, respiratory-gated delivery with minimal safety margins, and time-consuming daily plan re-optimisation. We report on early clinical outcomes of MRgRT and routine plan re-optimization for large primary renal cell cancer (RCC). Thirty-six patients were treated with MRgRT in 40 Gy/5 fractions. Prior to each fraction, re-contouring of tumor and normal organs on a pretreatment MR-scan allowed daily plan re-optimization. Treatment-induced toxicity and radiological responses were scored, which was followed by an offline analysis to evaluate the need for such daily re-optimization in 180 fractions. Mean age and tumor diameter were 78.1 years and 5.6 cm, respectively. All patients completed MRgRT with an average fraction duration of 45 min. Local control (LC) and overall survival rates at one year were 95.2% and 91.2%. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. Plans without re-optimization met institutional radiotherapy constraints in 83.9% of 180 fractions. Thus, daily plan re-optimization was required for only a minority of patients, who can be identified upfront by a higher volume of normal organs receiving 25 Gy in baseline plans. In conclusion, stereotactic MRgRT for large primary RCC showed low toxicity and high LC, while daily plan re-optimization was required only in a minority of patients.

Changes in gastric anatomy after delivery of breath-hold MR-guided SABR for adrenal metastases.

Delivery of breath-hold MR-guided SABR is time-consuming, and the use of real-time tumor-tracking in a sagittal plane may fail to detect out-of-plane displacements of organs-at-risk. Analysis of daily MR-scans performed pre- and post-SABR revealed frequent decreases in stomach volumes, and in the planned stomach doses.

Resectability and Ablatability Criteria for the Treatment of Liver Only Colorectal Metastases: Multidisciplinary Consensus Document from the COLLISION Trial Group.

The guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer crudely state that the best local treatment should be selected from a 'toolbox' of techniques according to patient- and treatment-related factors. We created an interdisciplinary, consensus-based algorithm with specific resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). To pursue consensus, members of the multidisciplinary COLLISION and COLDFIRE trial expert panel employed the RAND appropriateness method (RAM). Statements regarding patient, disease, tumor and treatment characteristics were categorized as appropriate, equipoise or inappropriate. Patients with ECOG≤2, ASA≤3 and Charlson comorbidity index ≤8 should be considered fit for curative-intent local therapy. When easily resectable and/or ablatable (stage IVa), (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy is not indicated. When requiring major hepatectomy (stage IVb), neo-adjuvant systemic therapy is appropriate for early metachronous disease and to reduce procedural risk. To downstage patients (stage IVc), downsizing induction systemic therapy and/or future remnant augmentation is advised. Disease can only be deemed permanently unsuitable for local therapy if downstaging failed (stage IVd). Liver resection remains the gold standard. Thermal ablation is reserved for unresectable CRLM, deep-seated resectable CRLM and can be considered when patients are in poor health. Irreversible electroporation and stereotactic body radiotherapy can be considered for unresectable perihilar and perivascular CRLM 0-5cm. This consensus document provides per-patient and per-tumor resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of CRLM. These criteria are intended to aid tumor board discussions, improve consistency when designing prospective trials and advance intersociety communications. Areas where consensus is lacking warrant future comparative studies.

Once-a-week or every-other-day urethra-sparing prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy, a randomized phase II trial: 18 months follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: To present the 18 months results from a prospective multicenter phase II randomized trial of short vs protracted urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, a total of 170 PCa patients were randomized to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy × 5 to the urethra) delivered either every other day (EOD, arm A, n = 84) or once a week (QW, arm B, n = 86). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (CTCAE v4.0 scale), IPSS, and QoL scores were assessed at baseline, at the 5th fraction (5fx), 12th weeks (12W), and every 6 months after SBRT. The primary endpoint was biochemical control at 18 months and grade ≥ 3 toxicity (including grade ≥ 2 for urinary obstruction/retention) during the first 3 months. RESULTS: Among the 165 patients analyzed, the toxicity stopping rule was never activated during the acute phase. Maximum acute grade 2 GU toxicity rates at 5fx were 17% and 19% for arms A and B, respectively, with only 2 cases of grade 2 GI toxicity at 5fx in arm A. At month 18, grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity decreased below 5% and 2% for both arms. No changes in EORTC QLQ-PR25 scores for GU, GI, and sexual domains were observed in both arms between baseline and month 18. Four biochemical failures were observed, 2 in each arm, rejecting the null hypothesis of an unfavorable response rate ≤ 85% in favor of an acceptable ≥ 95% rate. CONCLUSIONS: At 18 months, urethra-sparing SBRT showed a low toxicity profile, with minimal impact on QoL and favorable biochemical control rates, regardless of overall treatment time (EOD vs QW).